Extra Credit Ethically Help Charities
Underprivileged people struggle, and, out of the goodness of their hearts, many selfless individuals donate to charities to help them. Unable to rely on such selflessness, many organizations also offer incentives for others to donate, while the government offers tax breaks.
Teachers also often offer extra credit for students to support charities, which critics say undermines the purpose of giving and unfairly influences the grade book. Although offering grades for charity can undermine its value as a selfless act, it is not necessarily unfair and it fulfills the purpose of charity and pushes people to participate.
The point of charity is to promote a cause, not selflessness. If someone can push people to donate, it helps more of those in need. Recently, my school had a toy drive. Many teachers offered extra credit for people to bring in a toy, while those who did not claimed that charity should be an act of selflessness. But consider the perspective of an elementary schooler who receives a toy. If one of the only toys they would receive for Christmas would be from the toy drive, more students donating would mean more children receive what they asked for. It wouldn’t matter that the student who donated the toy did it for extra credit, the child would be happy to receive their toy. Maximizing happiness for the biggest number of people is the purpose of charity, which is stimulated by incentives.
Some argue that incentivizing contributions to charity is unfair to those who cannot donate. In the case of teachers offering extra credit, it’s not required for a grade, it’s something extra. And with the toy drive, there’s more to do than just donating toys. The toys need to be wrapped and labeled, volunteer work that is a form of charity. Helping to prepare toys could count for extra credit. In the scenario where one is unable to contribute to the charity at all, there’s no penalty to them. Nothing is lost, but many people gain. Teachers offering extra credit for contributing to charity increases the amount of people helped and comes in forms accessible to many people.
Selflessness is not the purpose of charity, and an inability to contribute does no harm; therefore teachers offering extra credit to students who contribute is ethical.
By Matthew Teymouri (11)
Extra Credit for Charity Unfairly Skews Grades
My school recently put on a toy drive where some of my teachers offered extra credit for donations while others opposed the idea. While offering extra credit for donations can increase the amount of donations made, it ultimately raises ethical concerns because it is wrong for donations to affect a student’s grade.
One of the main reasons many teachers offer extra credit for donations is because they can receive more donations for a charity. With a grade incentive, students feel more compelled to donate. This can help aid charities; however, it is morally wrong because students need to learn to donate on their own. This way, students will be more likely to do spontaneous charitable acts in the future rather than looking for personal gain.
In addition to this, offering students extra credit for donations is inappropriate because it changes what their grade represents. A student’s grade should be based on class performance, not willingness to give to charity. Giving a donation to a charity is not an accurate measure of their understanding of class material and therefore should not affect their grade.
Also, giving grade bumps for donations is wrong because it creates unequal opportunity for the students. Giving donations often requires a student to put in money. Students who can’t afford this would therefore be at a disadvantage in the class. Their grades would be lower due to circumstances out of their control rather than their understanding of class material. This is morally wrong because it unfairly benefits some students over others.
It is wrong for teachers to offer extra credit for students giving donations. While some people argue that it helps charities by increasing donations, it is overall a morally wrong thing to do. It not only gives students an incentive for acts they should learn to do by themselves, but it also results in inaccurate and unfair grades. Therefore, even though some argue for it, teachers should not offer extra credit for charitable acts.
By Camille Smith (11)
Jillian • Feb 10, 2025 at 11:09 PM
I agree with a lot of Matthew’s points because at the end of the day, the receivers of the charitable acts do not care about why the gift was donated. By rewarding students with extra credit for donations, not only could you see a better performance in donations, but both parties will be happy with the outcome.
Amanda • Feb 10, 2025 at 10:31 PM
I agree with Matthew’s point. The main objective is happiness and if that means offering incentives to maximize that, I think it is reasonable to offer a small incentive. Camille brings up a good counter point because the small reward is worth time and money which some students may not have. It becomes unfair to those who cannot afford to buy any gifts.
Miley McNamee • Feb 10, 2025 at 9:16 PM
I agree with Camille that providing extra credit for charitable acts gives an unfair advantage to some students over others. While it is true that the extra credit isn’t required and doesn’t hurt you if you don’t do it, it still gives opportunities that aren’t attainable for everyone which is not equitable. Matthew made a very good point that the point of charity isn’t selflessness it is to promote a cause.
Matt Teymouri • Feb 10, 2025 at 8:55 PM
Camille brings up a lot of great points in her essay, namely grade inflation and promoting students to donate on their own. I do believe, however, that grade inflation is a more minor issue. If a teacher is willing to give extra credit out for donating, they’d likely give extra credit out for other things. While I agree that offering extra credit diminishes a grades meaning, I think that the extra credit given from donating would at least be helping a good cause. In an ideal world a grade would be a reflection of course understanding, but in the world we live in that’s just not how it is, so at the very least offering extra credit for donating to charity can help a cause. Charity is true when it comes from the heart, and it would be great if everyone donated just to help the world, but as I said in my essay, it’s more important to consider a utilitarian perspective that maximizes happiness for the greatest number of people.
Samrita Naidu • Feb 10, 2025 at 6:07 PM
The practice of offering incentives for charitable acts is widespread ranging from federal income tax deductions for charitable contributions to teachers awarding extra credit or community service hours for student donations. However, this raises an important question: Does offering rewards for charitable acts undermine the moral value of the donation? Though the motivation for donating to a charitable foundation might not be to perform a selfless act, the charity will still reap the benefits of the donation, therefore making the incentives ethical.
Camille Smith • Feb 10, 2025 at 5:12 PM
Matthew argues that offering extra credit for donations increases the number of donations. He says that charity exists for a cause and not to promote selflessness. While this is a good point, if people are incentivized to donate to charity, they will be less likely to do so in the future. This reduces their overall contributions in the long run. Because of this, I agree with Camille.
Jackson Kirkley • Feb 10, 2025 at 2:08 PM
Without an incentive, charities rely on the same morals of picking up trash: convenience or strong character. This means that charities will receive less support and therefore have a less significant impact. By incentivizing charitable acts, the net outcome is a higher charitable success rate and pleased participants. Regardless of intentions, the charity can have a larger impact on both its target community and its participating community through incentives. Ethically, this falls back to the mission of a charity, which is to serve people in ways they cannot help themselves.
Jackson Kirkley • Feb 10, 2025 at 2:05 PM
Matthew brought up several important factors that point toward promoting charitable incentives. Primarily, he argues that the outcome of charities is more significant than the incentives of the givers, so offering extra credit for a donation accomplishes the charitable goal. He concedes that incentivized donations undermine the selflessness of the act, however, they also promote the intent of the charity. Overall he takes the stance that the ethics of charities should be judged based on how many people benefit from the donations.
Layla Douglas • Feb 10, 2025 at 8:59 AM
I agree with Matthew, extra credit does help charities. The point of the charity drive should be about the charity, and not how it gets donated too.
Madeline McGrath Htain • Feb 10, 2025 at 6:16 PM
I also agree with this. The main goal for the charity is to get donations, and even if students may not be donating ethically, they’re still contributing to a good cause.
Amanda • Feb 10, 2025 at 10:52 PM
I actually agree with you. The debate question is whether it is ok to give extra credit, not if it’s ethically ok.
Layla Douglas • Feb 10, 2025 at 8:47 AM
Students should be offered extra credit for donating to charity since it does help the charities. It may boost donations and such, which is the goal of a charity drive.
Lucas Wang • Feb 10, 2025 at 5:37 PM
I agree that getting the most donations is more important. Then, you are able to help more people.
Lucas Wang • Feb 9, 2025 at 2:38 PM
I do agree with many of Matthew’s points. I think that charitable acts should be incentivized because maximizing happiness is the most important part. Also, I agree with his counter argument because everyone now has an equitable chance to get the incentive. To Camille’s point about extra credit. It’s often just 5 or 10 points worth of extra credit. Is that really enough to have a drastic impact to lead you to say that we shouldn’t give extra credit at all? I’m not sure if it’s worth losing all of those donations just because it impacts your grade a little.
Samrita Naidu • Feb 10, 2025 at 6:03 PM
Hi Lucas! I completely agree with you. Matthew had many points that I agreed with. When charities receive more donations, they are able to help more people. Camille also had some great points about the immorality of giving extra credit for charitable acts.
Madeline McGrath Htain • Feb 10, 2025 at 6:14 PM
I understand where you’re coming from about the extra credit being only 5 or 10 points but I do want to point out that if one teacher of a subject is offering extra credit and another teacher of the same subject isn’t, students may feel like this is unfair and develop a negative impression of the teacher who doesn’t offer extra credit.
Matt Teymouri • Feb 10, 2025 at 9:03 PM
Wow, what an insightful reply from someone who’s likely a very handsome gentleman. I like the point you bring up of the amount of extra credit being very small, not noticeably affecting peoples grades.
Miley McNamee • Feb 10, 2025 at 10:45 PM
I do agree it is important to promote as much hapiness as possible, but I also think it is important to make sure we aren’t only considering the outcome. I don’t think Camille was commenting on the amount of extra credit, more so the unfairness of it.
jillian • Feb 10, 2025 at 11:11 PM
I agree with you, but I also understand Camille’s argument. I think if charitable acts are constantly being exchanged for extra credit, soon those 5-10 points can drastically change a students grade. For some, it can change their B to an A, which is an unfair grade bump to those who dont have the finances to donate